Links to
important historical information
By Trevor Davis
7-2-2008
www.soundingthealarm.com
Let him that reads
understand…
Why this study is
important---
|
|
“Who will rise up for me against
the evildoers? [or] who will stand up for me against the workers of
iniquity?” Well?…… |
|
And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness,
but rather reprove [them].
|
coup d'é·tat
|
a sudden and decisive
action in politics, esp. one resulting in a change of government illegally or
by force. Latest and most recent postings will be directly below. the Freeman Perspective "Codex
Magica" Part 2 Illuminati
Corporate Logos www.freemantv.com
http://www.911lies.org/home.html Physicist and Archaeometrist
When you eliminate the impossible, whatever
remains, however improbable, must be the truth. - Arthur Conan Doyle, Sr.,
creator of Sherlock Holmes If it's important to you to believe that Western
society is structured such that "good" always triumphs - at least
in 'big' matters, that Kojak always 'gets the bad guy', and that the
evildoers are a small minority of bad eggs eagerly exposed by the valiant
press, this a critical principle to keep in mind. 911 Mysteries demolishes
the 'official' 911 conspiracy theory more graphically than any movie
previously released. See for yourself what really happened in the 3
demolished buildings in the weeks before 9/11. Since 9-11 the American public
has shown a "remarkable indifference to being deceived" (George
Soros). But this is changing. As Hugo Chavez put it: "The world is
waking up. It's waking up all over. And people are standing up."
Millions around the world are realizing that they are being lied to - not in
a small, lazy way, but in a big way. It's time to ask hard questions, many of
which 911 Mysteries helps to answer. 90 minutes of evidence and analysis,
filled with eyewitness testimonials. Point-by-point review of the official
story set alongside clear science. The question is not one of politics or
nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple physics. Does steel melt
in open air fires? What caused the core to vanish in seconds? No agenda. No
finger-pointing. Just the facts and the questions. A story of people: Willie
Rodriguez's strange recollection of noises on the 34th floor. Who was up
there, bumping around? Scott Forbes' similar story, weeks before the towers
fell. Here's how shaped charges slice through steel beams to control the way
they fall. For greater clarity, download the movie - or buy a DVD online at
www.911weknow.com. Finally, make sure you don't miss the ending - minutes
1:26-1:30. Absolutely the best part. 911 is a Keyhole into Consciousness. If
you make it through to the other side, everything looks different. Do Not Be
Afraid. Follow your curiosity, like Alice in the rabbit hole. You are
becoming free. Keywords: World Trade Center, WTC, WTC7, NIST, FEMA,
Controlled Demolition, Freedom to Fascism, Thermate, Thermite, 9-11,
September 11th, George Bush, Dick Cheney, NORAD, FAA, FBI, CIA, NSA, Larry
Silverstein, William Rodriguez, Alex Jones, Loose Change Statement by David
Rockefeller in print of his agreement with a one world agenda and a
non-sovereign United States. Templar
Origins of Freemasonry-freemantv.com (Editor note:
Very in depth, new information rarely heard; some things regarding biblical
truth not understood by Freeman as in the death at the fall recorded in
Genesis) 82 min - Nov 24, 2006 -
|
Suggested Reading/Viewing:
Google Video
1. 9/11 The
Myth and the Reality: Dr. David Ray Griffin
Composed of two
powerful speeches given the masterful Philosopher and Theologist Dr. David
Ray Griffin at The Commonwealth Club in San Francisco (4/3/06)
98 min - Oct 18, 2006 -
2. David Ray
Griffin - 911 Commission Report: Ommissions and Di...
A lecture by
David Ray Griffin about the "9/11 Commission Report" and his
latest book " The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions
59 min - Apr 11, 2006 -
3. September
Eleventh; Should the truth be revealed or conceale...
David Ray
Griffin, 9/11 Lecture, Copenhagen September 41. 2006 David Ray Griffin, 9/11 foredrag,
Křbenhavn 14. September 2006 http://www.1192001.dk/
4. Martial Law/911 by Alex Jones (180 minute version)
Note author John Buchanan comments and study about failed
Nazi coup in US 1930’s.
Alex Jones
Martial Law 911 Rise of the Police State
180 min - May 1, 2005 -
5. Dr. Stan Montieth interviews William Grigg:
http://www.soundwaves2000.com/radio_liberty/
|
5.14.2008 9:00: William Grigg: Impending Police
State |
|
|
|
Click hereStandard
Player |
|
|
6. “Painful
Deceptions” by Eric Hufschmidt (Issues
regarding demolished towers/Pentagon of 9/11)
|
6. David Ray Griffin: Videos on 911. (Excellent
compilation on conflicting data of the 911 story)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3195658770053494633&q=david%20ray%20griffin%20american%20empire&hl=en
7. Google Video Search: David Ray Griffin
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=david+ray+griffin&hl=En&sitesearch=#
|
8. Alex Jones
at American Scholars Symposium (Absolutely must see this and the critical evidence herein) |
91 min - Jul 8, 2006 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
C-Span (CSPAN) covered this American
Scholars Symposium on 911 in Los Angeles. The 9/11 story presented to us by the
mainstream media was a bit shady I thought, so this video really helped to clear
some of it up for me. I downloaded this film from prisonplanet.tv and have been
granted access to show it to you here by Alex Jones. Please watch this and feel
free to show it to others. -ken solar see also: http://KenSolar.com/dyk
keywords: September 11th, 2001, charlie sheen, infowars, steven jones, robert
bowman, james fetzer, webster griffin tarpley, william rodriguez, loose change,
dylan avery, truth, day 2, second day, 2nd day
9. A. Occult
History of Hitler’s Third Reich (Really important to watch!!)
103 min - Aug 30, 2007 - -
VISIT POPPERSLIST.BLOGSPOT.COM FOR MORE GREAT PROGRAMS Nazis: The
Occult Conspiracy, is an English language documentary regarding the occult
influences and history of the Nazi Era, (pre, during and post) in Germany. New
evidence has suggested that Nazism was not just a political movement but an
occult religion with Hitler as the Messiah.
|
10. The Occult
History of the Third Reich Adolf Hitler (Really important to watch!!) |
|
54 min - Jan 1, 1999 - -
Four volume documentary set
("Adolph Hitler", "The SS Blood and Soil", "The Enigma
of the Swastika", and "Himmler The Mystic") containing mainly
B&W as well as some color archival footage, with narration explaining the
influences of alternative belief systems (occult, paganism, mysticism, etc) on
the Nazi ideology and Hitler's personal philosophy. Also documents the history
and development of the ideas and symbols that would be used along with
eugenicist racial politics to perpetrate the murder and oppression of millions
during World War II. Other search word: Conspiracy
11.The Sorcerers of Atlantis (click)(By Freeman of
freemantv.com—very good info and I pray for his conversion to the Lord Jesus)
12. Corporate Logos and Freemasonry (Excellent)
13. David Rivera: Final Warning - A History of the New World Ord... 162 min (This is like a university course to study!) This is very
important to study. 14.Riddles in stone - Secret Architechture of Washington D.C. 174 min - Jan
6, 2008
America, Freemasonry, Occult, Kaballah, Qaballah, George Washington, Thomas
Jefferson, Founding fathers, satan, satanic architechture 15.Secret_mysteries_of_americas_beginning.avi 165 min - Dec
6, 2007 - 17.David Ray Griffin: More material fact presented below. Sunday, May 22 2005 - 9/11
Commission The
9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie In
discussing my second 9/11 book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions
and Distortions, I have often said, only half in jest, that a better
title might have been "a 571-page lie." (Actually, I was saying
"a 567-page lie," because I was forgetting to count the four
pages of the Preface.) In making this statement, one of my points has been
that the entire Report is constructed in support of one big lie:
that the official story about 9/11 is true. (c)
David Ray Griffin. 911truth.org
hereby grants to all readers of this website permission to link to any and
all articles found in the public areas of the website, www.911truth.org, so
long as the full source URL (http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050523112738404
in this case) is posted with the article. ^ David Ray
Griffin: Videos on 911. (Excellent compilation on conflicting
data of the 911 story) Composed
of two powerful speeches given the masterful ... a sudden and decisive action in politics, esp. one
resulting in a change of government illegally or by force. Notes: On September 11th
2001 There are so many questions regarding the tragedy of 9/11. The above bullet points are believed to
be authentic questionable aspects of 9/11.
The
investigation into President Clinton cost a reported $42 Million while the
amount spent to study the crashes of 911 were approximately $600,000. Historically,
Nero of Rome in the 1st Century burned the Senate building and
accused the Christians of the event.
This was the way they got the public to rally behind the cause
against Christians. They were made
to be enemies of the state of Rome. Stalin
of Russia also burned a building and blamed others. Hitler of the
Third Reich burned the Reichstag and said it was the Communists. Many call this tactic “false flags” or
“false colors”. World
War II had the US enter the war by way of “the surprise attack” on Pearl
Harbor. In
the 1960’s, the US fostered a plan to fly a plane with college students and
shoot it down with the accusation of the event aimed at Castro’s Cuba. It was called Operation Northwoods. It
is now coming to light that the USS Liberty was attacked during the Israeli
6-day war by Israel as secretly agreed by President Johnson and other
military policy makers. The US was
secretly involved in that war and was looking for an excuse to enter a war
in the Middle East. The plan failed
due to a witness of the attack by a Russian ship. Men died and many were wounded as their country planned and
executed this in the 1960’s. Read
this carefully. Let him that reads
understand… Smoke and
Mirrors. “Be wise as a serpent but harmless as a dove.” The above cited
issues are believed to be authentic and it is recommended that a careful
review of history through any and all available information source for
verification of fact. All items may
be amended in accordance to discovery of information contrary to statements
contained herein. All aspects are
thought to be correct but the author-editor reserves the right to correct
and change anything upon proper evidence to the contrary. Trevor Davis--editor. An excellent
compilation of conflicting facts to the official 911 story: http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050523112738404 BROKEN ARROW ?
The BROKEN ARROW
posting at sounding the alarm.com was posted on 6.3.2008. Notes on 9/11: Issues By Trevor Davis 6/1/2008 Over the space of one week I was led to study Nazi
Occult History and the terror of 911. I share this below for your consideration. Many of you have already seen these
things. Watch out for the spirit of this age that seeks to
promote passivity and ambivalence.
I am convinced that those behind the evil attempts to control the
world have disarmed the people, not only from Constitutional protections,
but disarmed the peoples’ minds and spirits as they haphazardly wander
through an artificial ‘matrix’ of life.
We absolutely must determine what is right, true and
authentic! God bless you in Jesus Christ. Trevor Davis coup d'é·tat a sudden and decisive action in politics, esp. one resulting
in a change of government illegally or by force. I posted this below 9.19.2007 INTRIGUE Friday September 14th of this year after recording
the TRUNEWS broadcast I went to the library. I had an experience that I would like to report to
you. Now, keep in mind the day
that I am speaking of here I had been involved in almost two weeks of
discussions of a very serious story about a B52 Bomber loaded with
5-6 nuclear warheads being mysteriously transported from North Dakota to
Louisiana unbeknownst to the flight crew or the authorities of the Air
Force. This story reports that
the Air Force called for an investigation of this event and a review of
policies handling nuclear weapons and had instilled a stand-down of the
fighters and bombers here in the U.S. that particular Friday the 14th
of September. I was personally
involved in interviews, broadcasts and recordings that discussed the
serious nature of this event and its ramifications both evident and not
evident for—again---almost two weeks. I proceeded to the local library after the broadcast and selected
a handful of DVD’s on history and survival. Then it came to my mind to look for some music CD’s. This was very unusual for me since it
had been almost two years as I recall checking out music from the
library. I selected various music
choices from classical to popular music from the 1960’s like Burt
Bacharach and the Buffalo Springfield. Here is where it gets very intriguing… First: I got the goose bumps as I listened to the first song on the
Buffalo Springfield CD called Retrospective. That song was about the political
turmoil of the ‘60’s and called for the people to stop and note the sound
and look what was going on… (see lyrics of this
song at the end of this article) The eighth song on
this album... Note---I am not saying the LORD is showing me
this. But, I
thought it so intriguing that I spent hours musing over it and
considering the weird forces that be and their "sinister" glee
in the covert plans they have.... wondering if it is possible that this
old song had or has plans for the occultist beast people (?). What if I told you
there is a song here in this CD that--- ·
Speaks of a
group of people that created a drama that sought to cause people to
scream, But, it will be the
brown skinned Indian who carries the........ _________________________________________________________________________________ Admire Jesus Christ! He
has told us all things that will come in order that those who love and obey
Him would not give up. He
is with all who trust Him until the end of the age. He
will never leave nor abandon them. He
has answered the disciple’s questions regarding the end of the age, the
signs of when those things will come to pass and of His coming. Read the scripture. Open your heart to the Lord. Listen to Him. Obey Him. It
is very simple. Be
like a child for of such is the Kingdom of God. As
the catastrophic events are being unleashed in the earth, those who
wickedly harden themselves against the Father and His Son Jesus Christ will
find trouble and anguish of heart.
But, for those who walk tenderly before Him they will find wonderful
peace and joy. There
will be wars and rumors of wars.
Kingdom against kingdom and nation against nation. There will be multiple events and
troubles occurring at the same time:
famines, pestilences and earthquakes in various places. Jesus
said, “Take heed” unto yourself. He
warned that many would be deceived by the many lying false christs,
prophets and teachers. Learn
of Jesus. Be like Him. Do not follow the liars that lie in wait
to deceive the gullible. There
will be persecution of the faithful ones of the Lord. He
has told us already. It
will be the opportunity of eternity to stand and be a testimony for Jesus. This
is something to be rejoicing and glad about! The
times are coming that all these things will come to pass. They will include the betrayal by those
closest to you and the false religious system will harm the true lambs of
the Shepherd. Luke 21:18 But there shall
not an hair of your head perish. 19 In
your patience possess ye your souls. Luke 21 5 And as some spake of
the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said, 6 As for these things
which ye behold, the days will come, in the which there shall not be left
one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. 7 And they asked him,
saying, Master, but when shall these things be? and what sign will there be
when these things shall come to pass? 8 And he said, Take
heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am
Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them. 9 But when ye shall
hear of wars and commotions, be not terrified: for these things must first
come to pass; but the end is not by and by. 10 Then said he unto
them, Nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: 11 And great
earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and pestilences; and
fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven. 12 But before all
these, they shall lay their hands on you, and persecute you, delivering you
up to the synagogues, and into prisons, being brought before kings and
rulers for my name's sake. 13 And
it shall turn to you for a testimony. 14 Settle it
therefore in your hearts, not to meditate before what ye shall answer: 15 For I will give
you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to
gainsay nor resist. 16 And
ye shall be betrayed both by parents, and brethren, and kinsfolks, and
friends; and some of you shall they cause to be put to death. 17 And ye shall be
hated of all men for my name's sake. 18 But there shall
not an hair of your head perish. 19 In
your patience possess ye your souls. 20 And when ye shall
see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof
is nigh. 21 Then
let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are
in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries
enter thereinto. 22 For
these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be
fulfilled. 23 But
woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those
days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people.
24 And they shall
fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all
nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the
times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. 25 And there shall be
signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth
distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring; 26 Men's hearts
failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming
on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken. 27 And then shall
they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. 28 And when these
things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for
your redemption draweth nigh. 29 And he spake to them
a parable; Behold the fig tree, and all the trees; 30 When they now
shoot forth, ye see and know of your own selves that summer is now nigh at
hand. 31 So likewise
ye, when ye see these things come to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God
is nigh at hand. 32 Verily
I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled.
33 Heaven and
earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away. 34 And take heed to
yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting,
and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you
unawares. 35 For
as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole
earth. 36 Watch ye
therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all
these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man.
(Freeman Perspective)28:39
In
1910, a group of international bankers secretly met on a small island off the
coast of Georgia. Their plan: to formulate a program to destroy the financial
structure of America. To do that, they pushed Woodrow Wilson into the
presidency; and in 1913, Wilson signed into law, the Federal Reserve Act and
the Federal Income Tax. In 1921, these international bankers established the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The U.S. Government took advantage of the
CFR's experience in finance and foreign affairs, and one of their study groups,
the Advisory Committee on Post-War Foreign Policy, became part of the State
Department in 1941. The secret goal of this study group was to condition the
Congress, and the people of this country to accept the establishment of the
United Nations (UN). The UN, initiated in 1945, does not seek to promote world
peace and cooperation- it was the first step towards a one-world government,
which is now referred to as the New World Order. «
16.Another Excellent compilation of conflicting
facts to the official 911 story:
By Dr. David Ray
Griffin
Sunday, May 22, 2005
Another point, however, is that in the process of telling this overall lie,
The 9/11 Commission Report tells many lies about particular issues.
This point is implied by my critique's subtitle, "Omissions and
Distortions." It might be thought, to be sure, that of the two types
of problems signaled by those two terms, only those designated
"distortions" can be considered lies.
It is better, however, to understand the two terms as referring to two types
of lies: implicit and explicit. We have an explicit lie when the Report
claims that the core of each of the Twin Towers consisted of a hollow steel
shaft or when it claims that Vice President Cheney did not give the
shoot-down order until after 10:10 that morning. But we have an implicit
lie when the Commission, in its discussion of the 19 alleged suicide
hijackers, omits the fact that at least six of them have credibly been
reported to be still alive, or when it fails to mention the fact that Building
7 of the World Trade Center collapsed. Such omissions are implicit lies
partly because they show that the Commission did not honor its stated
intention "to provide the fullest possible account of the events
surrounding 9/11." They are also lies insofar as the Commission could
avoid telling an explicit lie about the issue in question only by not
mentioning it, which, I believe, was the case in at least most instances.
Given these two types of lies, it might be wondered how many lies are
contained in The 9/11 Commission Report. I do not know. But,
deciding to see how many lies I had discussed in my book, I found that I
had identified over 100 of them. Once I had made the list, it occurred to
me that others might find this summary helpful. Hence this article.
One caveat: Although in some of the cases it is obvious that the Commission
has lied, in other cases I would say, as I make clear in the book, that it
appears that the Commission has lied. However, in the interests of simply
giving a brief listing of claims that I consider to be lies, I will ignore
this distinction between obvious and probable lies, leaving it to readers,
if they wish, to look up the discussion in The 9/11 Commission Report:
Omissions and Distortions. For ease in doing this, I have parenthetically
indicated the pages of the book on which the various issues are discussed.
Given this clarification, I now list the omissions and claims of The
9/11 Commission Report that I, in my critique of that report, portrayed
as lies:
1. The omission of
evidence that at least six of the alleged hijackers---including Waleed
al-Shehri, said by the Commission probably to have stabbed a flight
attendant on Flight 11 before it crashed into the North Tower of the
WTC---are still alive (19-20).
2. The omission of evidence about Mohamed Atta---such as his reported
fondness for alcohol, pork, and lap dances---that is in tension with the
Commission's claim that he had become fanatically religious (20-21).
3. The obfuscation of the evidence that Hani Hanjour was too poor a pilot
to have flown an airliner into the Pentagon (21-22).
4. The omission of the fact that the publicly released flight manifests
contain no Arab names (23).
5. The omission of the fact that fire has never, before or after 9/11,
caused steel-frame buildings to collapse (25).
6. The omission of the fact that the fires in the Twin Towers were not very
big, very hot, or very long-lasting compared with fires in several
steel-frame buildings that did not collapse (25-26).
7. The omission of the fact that, given the hypothesis that the collapses
were caused by fire, the South Tower, which was struck later than the North
Tower and also had smaller fires, should not have collapsed first (26).
8. The omission of the fact that WTC 7 (which was not hit by an airplane
and which had only small, localized fires) also collapsed---an occurrence
that FEMA admitted it could not explain (26).
9. The omission of the fact that the collapse of the Twin Towers (like that
of Building 7) exemplified at least 10 features suggestive of controlled
demolition (26-27).
10. The claim that the core of each of the Twin Towers was "a hollow
steel shaft"---a claim that denied the existence of the 47 massive
steel columns that in reality constituted the core of each tower and that,
given the "pancake theory" of the collapses, should have still
been sticking up many hundreds of feet in the air (27-28).
11. The omission of Larry Silverstein's statement that he and the fire
department commander decided to "pull" Building 7 (28).
12. The omission of the fact that the steel from the WTC buildings was
quickly removed from the crime scene and shipped overseas before it could
be analyzed for evidence of explosives (30).
13. The omission of the fact that because Building 7 had been evacuated
before it collapsed, the official reason for the rapid removal of the
steel---that some people might still be alive in the rubble under the
steel---made no sense in this case (30).
14. The omission of Mayor Giuliani's statement that he had received word
that the World Trade Center was going to collapse (30-31).
15. The omission of the fact that President Bush's brother Marvin and his
cousin Wirt Walker III were both principals in the company in charge of
security for the WTC (31-32).
16. The omission of the fact that the west wing of the Pentagon would have
been the least likely spot to be targeted by al-Qaeda terrorists, for
several reasons (33-34).
17. The omission of any discussion of whether the damage done to the
Pentagon was consistent with the impact of a Boeing 757 going several
hundred miles per hour (34).
18. The omission of the fact that there are photos showing that the west
wing's façade did not collapse until 30 minutes after the strike and also
that the entrance hole appears too small for a Boeing 757 to have entered
(34).
19. The omission of all testimony that has been used to cast doubt on
whether remains of a Boeing 757 were visible either inside or outside the
Pentagon (34-36).
20. The omission of any discussion of whether the Pentagon has a
anti-missile defense system that would have brought down a commercial
airliner---even though the Commission suggested that the al-Qaeda
terrorists did not attack a nuclear power plant because they assumed that
it would be thus defended (36).
21. The omission of the fact that pictures from various security
cameras---including the camera at the gas station across from the Pentagon,
the film from which was reportedly confiscated by the FBI immediately after
the strike---could presumably answer the question of what really hit the
Pentagon (37-38).
22. The omission of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld's reference to "the
missile [used] to damage [the Pentagon]" (39).
23. The apparent endorsement of a wholly unsatisfactory answer to the
question of why the Secret Service agents allowed President Bush to remain
at the Sarasota school at a time when, given the official story, they
should have assumed that a hijacked airliner might be about to crash into
the school (41-44).
24. The failure to explore why the Secret Service did not summon fighter
jets to provide air cover for Air Force One (43-46).
25. The claims that when the presidential party arrived at the school, no
one in the party knew that several planes had been hijacked (47-48).
26. The omission of the report that Attorney General Ashcroft was warned to
stop using commercial airlines prior to 9/11 (50).
27. The omission of David Schippers' claim that he had, on the basis of
information provided by FBI agents about upcoming attacks in lower
Manhattan, tried unsuccessfully to convey this information to Attorney
General Ashcroft during the six weeks prior to 9/11 (51).
28. The omission of any mention of the FBI agents who reportedly claimed to
have known the targets and dates of the attacks well in advance (51-52).
29. The claim, by means of a circular, question-begging rebuttal, that the
unusual purchases of put options prior to 9/11 did not imply advance
knowledge of the attacks on the part of the buyers (52-57).
30. The omission of reports that both Mayor Willie Brown and some Pentagon
officials received warnings about flying on 9/11 (57).
31. The omission of the report that Osama bin Laden, who already was
America's "most wanted" criminal, was treated in July 2001 by an
American doctor in the American Hospital in Dubai and visited by the local
CIA agent (59).
32. The omission of news stories suggesting that after 9/11 the US military
in Afghanistan deliberately allowed Osama bin Laden to escape (60).
33. The omission of reports, including the report of a visit to Osama bin
Laden at the hospital in Dubai by the head of Saudi intelligence, that were
in tension with the official portrayal of Osama as disowned by his family
and his country (60-61).
34. The omission of Gerald Posner's account of Abu Zubaydah's testimony,
according to which three members of the Saudi royal family---all of whom
later died mysteriously within an eight-day period---were funding al-Qaeda
and had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks (61-65).
35. The Commission's denial that it found any evidence of Saudi funding of
al-Qaeda (65-68).
36. The Commission's denial in particular that it found any evidence that
money from Prince Bandar's wife, Princess Haifa, went to al-Qaeda
operatives (69-70).
37. The denial, by means of simply ignoring the distinction between private
and commercial flights, that the private flight carrying Saudis from Tampa
to Lexington on September 13 violated the rules for US airspace in effect
at the time (71-76).
38. The denial that any Saudis were allowed to leave the United States
shortly after 9/11 without being adequately investigated (76-82).
39. The omission of evidence that Prince Bandar obtained special permission
from the White House for the Saudi flights (82-86).
40. The omission of Coleen Rowley's claim that some officials at FBI
headquarters did see the memo from Phoenix agent Kenneth Williams (89-90).
41. The omission of Chicago FBI agent Robert Wright's charge that FBI
headquarters closed his case on a terrorist cell, then used intimidation to
prevent him from publishing a book reporting his experiences (91).
42. The omission of evidence that FBI headquarters sabotaged the attempt by
Coleen Rowley and other Minneapolis agents to obtain a warrant to search
Zacarias Moussaoui's computer (91-94).
43. The omission of the 3.5 hours of testimony to the Commission by former
FBI translator Sibel Edmonds—-testimony that, according to her
later public letter to Chairman Kean, revealed serious 9/11-related
cover-ups by officials at FBI headquarters (94-101).
44. The omission of the fact that General Mahmoud Ahmad, the head of
Pakistan's intelligence agency (the ISI), was in Washington the week prior
to 9/11, meeting with CIA chief George Tenet and other US officials
(103-04).
45. The omission of evidence that ISI chief Ahmad had ordered $100,000 to
be sent to Mohamed Atta prior to 9/11 (104-07).
46. The Commission's claim that it found no evidence that any foreign
government, including Pakistan, had provided funding for the al-Qaeda
operatives (106).
47. The omission of the report that the Bush administration pressured
Pakistan to dismiss Ahmad as ISI chief after the appearance of the story
that he had ordered ISI money sent to Atta (107-09).
48. The omission of evidence that the ISI (and not merely al-Qaeda) was
behind the assassination of Ahmad Shah Masood (the leader of Afghanistan's
Northern Alliance), which occurred just after the week-long meeting between
the heads of the CIA and the ISI (110-112).
49. The omission of evidence of ISI involvement in the kidnapping and
murder of Wall Street Reporter Daniel Pearl (113).
50. The omission of Gerald Posner's report that Abu Zubaydah claimed that a
Pakistani military officer, Mushaf Ali Mir, was closely connected to both
the ISI and al-Qaeda and had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks (114).
51. The omission of the 1999 prediction by ISI agent Rajaa Gulum Abbas that
the Twin Towers would be "coming down" (114).
52. The omission of the fact that President Bush and other members of his
administration repeatedly spoke of the 9/11 attacks as
"opportunities" (116-17).
53. The omission of the fact that The Project for the New American Century,
many members of which became key figures in the Bush administration,
published a document in 2000 saying that "a new Pearl Harbor"
would aid its goal of obtaining funding for a rapid technological
transformation of the US military (117-18).
54. The omission of the fact that Donald Rumsfeld, who as head of the
commission on the US Space Command had recommended increased funding for
it, used the attacks of 9/11 on that very evening to secure such funding
(119-22).
55. The failure to mention the fact that three of the men who presided over
the failure to prevent the 9/11 attacks—-Secretary Rumsfeld, General
Richard Myers, and General Ralph Eberhart---were also three of the
strongest advocates for the US Space Command (122).
56. The omission of the fact that Unocal had declared that the Taliban
could not provide adequate security for it to go ahead with its oil-and-gas
pipeline from the Caspian region through Afghanistan and Pakistan (122-25).
57. The omission of the report that at a meeting in July 2001, US
representatives said that because the Taliban refused to agree to a US
proposal that would allow the pipeline project to go forward, a war against
them would begin by October (125-26).
58. The omission of the fact that Zbigniew Brzezinski in his 1997 book had
said that for the United States to maintain global primacy, it needed to
gain control of Central Asia, with its vast petroleum reserves, and that a
new Pearl Harbor would be helpful in getting the US public to support this
imperial effort (127-28).
59. The omission of evidence that some key members of the Bush
administration, including Donald Rumsfeld and his deputy Paul Wolfowitz,
had been agitating for a war with Iraq for many years (129-33).
60. The omission of notes of Rumsfeld's conversations on 9/11 showing that
he was determined to use the attacks as a pretext for a war with Iraq
(131-32).
61. The omission of the statement by the Project for the New American
Century that "the need for a substantial American force presence in
the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein"
(133-34).
62. The claim that FAA protocol on 9/11 required the time-consuming process
of going through several steps in the chain of command--even though the
Report cites evidence to the contrary (158).
63. The claim that in those days there were only two air force bases in
NORAD's Northeast sector that kept fighters on alert and that, in
particular, there were no fighters on alert at either McGuire or Andrews
(159-162).
64. The omission of evidence that Andrews Air Force Base did keep several
fighters on alert at all times (162-64).
65. The acceptance of the twofold claim that Colonel Marr of NEADS had to
telephone a superior to get permission to have fighters scrambled from Otis
and that this call required eight minutes (165-66).
66. The endorsement of the claim that the loss of an airplane's transponder
signal makes it virtually impossible for the US military's radar to track
that plane (166-67).
67. The claim that the Payne Stewart interception did not show NORAD's
response time to Flight 11 to be extraordinarily slow (167-69).
68. The claim that the Otis fighters were not airborne until seven minutes
after they received the scramble order because they did not know where to
go (174-75).
69. The claim that the US military did not know about the hijacking of
Flight 175 until 9:03, when it was crashing into the South Tower (181-82).
70. The omission of any explanation of (a) why NORAD's earlier report,
according to which the FAA had notified the military about the hijacking of
Flight 175 at 8:43, was now to be considered false and (b) how this report,
if it was false, could have been published and then left uncorrected for
almost three years (182).
71. The claim that the FAA did not set up a teleconference until 9:20 that morning
(183).
72. The omission of the fact that a memo by Laura Brown of the FAA says
that its teleconference was established at about 8:50 and that it included
discussion of Flight 175's hijacking (183-84, 186).
73. The claim that the NMCC teleconference did not begin until 9:29
(186-88).
74. The omission, in the Commission's claim that Flight 77 did not deviate
from its course until 8:54, of the fact that earlier reports had said 8:46
(189-90).
75. The failure to mention that the report that a large jet had crashed in
Kentucky, at about the time Flight 77 disappeared from FAA radar, was taken
seriously enough by the heads of the FAA and the FBI's counterterrorism
unit to be relayed to the White House (190).
76. The claim that Flight 77 flew almost 40 minutes through American
airspace towards Washington without being detected by the military's radar
(191-92).
77. The failure to explain, if NORAD's earlier report that it was notified
about Flight 77 at 9:24 was "incorrect," how this erroneous report
could have arisen, i.e., whether NORAD officials had been lying or simply
confused for almost three years (192-93).
78. The claim that the Langley fighter jets, which NORAD had previously
said were scrambled to intercept Flight 77, were actually scrambled in
response to an erroneous report from an (unidentified) FAA controller at
9:21 that Flight 11 was still up and was headed towards Washington
(193-99).
79. The claim that the military did not hear from the FAA about the
probable hijacking of Flight 77 before the Pentagon was struck (204-12).
80. The claim that Jane Garvey did not join Richard Clarke's
videoconference until 9:40, after the Pentagon was struck (210).
81. The claim that none of the teleconferences succeeded in coordinating
the FAA and military responses to the hijackings because "none of
[them] included the right officials from both the FAA and the Defense
Department"---although Richard Clarke says that his videoconference
included FAA head Jane Garvey as well as Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and
General Richard Myers, the acting chair of the joint chiefs of staff (211).
82. The Commission's claim that it did not know who from the Defense
Department participated in Clarke's videoconference---although Clarke's
book said that it was Donald Rumsfeld and General Myers (211-212).
83. The endorsement of General Myers' claim that he was on Capitol Hill
during the attacks, without mentioning Richard Clarke's contradictory
account, according to which Myers was in the Pentagon participating in
Clarke's videoconference (213-17).
84. The failure to mention the contradiction between Clarke's account of
Rumsfeld's whereabouts that morning and Rumsfeld's own accounts (217-19).
85. The omission of Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta's testimony,
given to the Commission itself, that Vice-President Cheney and others in
the underground shelter were aware by 9:26 that an aircraft was approaching
the Pentagon (220).
86. The claim that Pentagon officials did not know about an aircraft approaching
Pentagon until 9:32, 9:34, or 9:36---in any case, only a few minutes before
the building was hit (223).
87. The endorsement of two contradictory stories about the aircraft that
hit the Pentagon---one in which it executed a 330-degree downward spiral (a
"high-speed dive") and another in which there is no mention of
this maneuver (222-23).
88. The claim that the fighter jets from Langley, which were allegedly
scrambled to protect Washington from "Phantom Flight 11," were
nowhere near Washington because they were mistakenly sent out to sea
(223-24).
89. The omission of all the evidence suggesting that the aircraft that hit
the Pentagon was not Flight 77 (224-25).
90. The claim that the military was not notified by the FAA about Flight
93's hijacking until after it crashed (227-29, 232, 253).
91. The twofold claim that the NMCC did not monitor the FAA-initiated
conference and then was unable to get the FAA connected to the
NMCC-initiated teleconference (230-31).
92. The omission of the fact that the Secret Service is able to know
everything that the FAA knows (233).
93. The omission of any inquiry into why the NMCC initiated its own
teleconference if, as Laura Brown of the FAA has said, this is not standard
protocol (234).
94. The omission of any exploration of why General Montague Winfield not
only had a rookie (Captain Leidig) take over his role as the NMCC's
Director of Operations but also left him in charge after it was clear that
the Pentagon was facing an unprecedented crisis (235-36).
95. The claim that the FAA (falsely) notified the Secret Service between
10:10 and 10:15 that Flight 93 was still up and headed towards Washington
(237).
96. The claim that Vice President Cheney did not give the shoot-down
authorization until after 10:10 (several minutes after Flight 93 had
crashed) and that this authorization was not transmitted to the US military
until 10:31 (237-41).
97. The omission of all the evidence indicating that Flight 93 was shot
down by a military plane (238-39, 252-53).
98. The claim that Richard Clarke did not receive the requested shoot-down
authorization until 10:25 (240).
99. The omission of Clarke's own testimony, which suggests that he received
the shoot-down authorization by 9:50 (240).
100. The claim that Cheney did not reach the underground shelter (the PEOC
[Presidential Emergency Operations Center]) until 9:58 (241-44).
101. The omission of multiple testimony, including that of Norman Mineta to
the Commission itself, that Cheney was in the PEOC before 9:20 (241-44).
102. The claim that shoot-down authorization must be given by the president
(245).
103. The omission of reports that Colonel Marr ordered a shoot-down of
Flight 93 and that General Winfield indicated that he and others at the
NMCC had expected a fighter jet to reach Flight 93 (252).
104. The omission of reports that there were two fighter jets in the air a
few miles from NYC and three of them only 200 miles from Washington (251).
105. The omission of evidence that there were at least six bases with
fighters on alert in the northeastern part of the United States (257-58).
106. The endorsement of General Myers' claim that NORAD had defined its
mission in terms of defending only against threats from abroad (258-62).
107. The endorsement of General Myers' claim that NORAD had not recognized
the possibility that terrorists might use hijacked airliners as missiles
(262-63).
108. The failure to highlight the significance of evidence presented in the
Report itself, and to mention other evidence, showing that NORAD had indeed
recognized the threat that hijacked airliners might be used as missiles
(264-67).
109. The failure to probe the issue of how the "war games"
scheduled for that day were related to the military's failure to intercept
the hijacked airliners (268-69).
110. The failure to discuss the possible relevance of Operation Northwoods
to the attacks of 9/11 (269-71).
111. The claim---made in explaining why the military did not get
information about the hijackings in time to intercept them---that FAA
personnel inexplicably failed to follow standard procedures some 16 times
(155-56, 157, 179, 180, 181, 190, 191, 193, 194, 200, 202-03, 227, 237,
272-75).
112. The failure to point out that the Commission's claimed
"independence" was fatally compromised by the fact that its
executive director, Philip Zelikow, was virtually a member of the Bush
administration (7-9, 11-12, 282-84).
113. The failure to point out that the White House first sought to prevent
the creation of a 9/11 Commission, then placed many obstacles in its path,
including giving it extremely meager funding (283-85).
114. The failure to point out that the Commission's chairman, most of the
other commissioners, and at least half of the staff had serious conflicts
of interest (285-90, 292-95).
115. The failure of the Commission, while bragging that it presented its
final report "without dissent," to point out that this was
probably possible only because Max Cleland, the commissioner who was most
critical of the White House and swore that he would not be part of
"looking at information only partially," had to resign in order
to accept a position with the Export-Import Bank, and that the White House
forwarded his nomination for this position only after he was becoming quite
outspoken in his criticisms (290-291).
I will close by pointing out that I concluded my study of what I came to
call "the Kean-Zelikow Report" by writing that it, "far from
lessening my suspicions about official complicity, has served to confirm
them. Why would the minds in charge of this final report engage in such
deception if they were not trying to cover up very high crimes?" (291)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3195658770053494633&q=david%20ray%20griffin%20american%20empire&hl=en9/11 The Myth and the
Reality: Dr. David
Ray Griffin
99 min -
coup d'é·tat
Secret evil agendas.
---Jesus Christ--- the truthful leader; the Lord, the Savior of the
world.
_______________________
On 6.5.2008 this story was just posted on CNN regarding the firing of two
leading officials of the Air Force for the event of the B52 and its
unbeknownst arsenal last summer. http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/05/pentagon.firings/index.html
I believe the LORD of truth desires His people understand the truth and the
reality of evil behind the covert of secrecy. This is the time when the truth well be heralded from the
rooftops and all the lies will be exposed by the glory of God. One must search their heart and not
allow the lies, myths, half-truths; distortions and the like to take
root. We must be lovers of the
truth, willing to stand for the truth, lest we be given over to believe
the illusions of grandeur. Is truth
important to you?
AND THE BROKEN ARROW
By Trevor Davis
9/19/2007
*For What It's Worth - Buffalo Springfield 1966
Wait till you see the title of this song!
BROKEN ARROW
By Trevor Davis
6/25/2008
Admire Jesus Christ!
Through all of this Jesus said,
“Not one hair of your head shall
perish!”
Luke 21:18
1.And he looked up, and
saw the rich men casting their gifts into the treasury. 2 And he saw also a
certain poor widow casting in thither two mites. 3 And he said, Of a
truth I say unto you, that this poor widow hath cast in more than they all:
4 For all these
have of their abundance cast in unto the offerings of God: but she of her
penury hath cast in all the living that she had.